Posts Tagged ‘Guantanamo Bay’

Do you remember how the 9/11 attacks happened, and then there was an investigation into whether anything could have been done differently to prevent it, and it turned out that the various government agencies hadn’t been sharing intelligence and information very well? And do you remember how George W Bush (“He Kept Us Safe“) fixed all of that, with his Department of Homeland Security and his daily briefings and his general level of awesomeness?

Well, as the Obama administration begins its plans to close Arkham Asylum Guantanamo Bay, it’s discovering just how effectively information is recorded and shared after seven years of Him Keeping Us Safe:


Read Full Post »


Those United States just might become a nation of laws:

President Obama on Thursday signed into effect the Executive Order directing the closing of the detention facilities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.  The final Order, containing his signature, is here.

… a plan for, first, a full-scale review of the case of each of the remaining 245 or so prisoners; second, relocation of the prisoners either to the U.S. or to foreign countries with full release for some, and, third, prosecution of some — though not necessarily in regular civilian courts — for terrorist-related crimes.

In the meantime, the Order indicated, the government would extend full protection under all humane treaties on prisoners’ rights for those still at Guantanamo, indicating an end to any harsh treatment in violation of four aspects of the Geneva Convention.

More on the legal steps being taken from JURIST’s Jaclyn Belczyk.

Read Full Post »

Where a government sanctions doing this to its prisoners, all the while telling its people that America does not torture:

“For 160 days his only contact was with the interrogators,” said Crawford, who personally reviewed Qahtani’s interrogation records and other military documents. “Forty-eight of 54 consecutive days of 18-to-20-hour interrogations. Standing naked in front of a female agent. Subject to strip searches. And insults to his mother and sister.”

At one point he was threatened with a military working dog named Zeus, according to a military report. Qahtani “was forced to wear a woman’s bra and had a thong placed on his head during the course of his interrogation” and “was told that his mother and sister were whores.” With a leash tied to his chains, he was led around the room “and forced to perform a series of dog tricks,” the report shows.

The interrogation, portions of which have been previously described by other news organizations, including The Washington Post, was so intense that Qahtani had to be hospitalized twice at Guantanamo with bradycardia, a condition in which the heart rate falls below 60 beats a minute and which in extreme cases can lead to heart failure and death. At one point Qahtani’s heart rate dropped to 35 beats per minute, the record shows.

Where one of its leading columnists discusses inflicting widespread fear and destruction on a civilian population (a general practice that, if not carried out by a national military force, would be referred to as “terrorism”) as a valid strategic goal to counter the acts of a terrorist group within that population:

Israel’s counterstrategy was to use its Air Force to pummel Hezbollah and, while not directly targeting the Lebanese civilians with whom Hezbollah was intertwined, to inflict substantial property damage and collateral casualties on Lebanon at large. It was not pretty, but it was logical. Israel basically said that when dealing with a nonstate actor, Hezbollah, nested among civilians, the only long-term source of deterrence was to exact enough pain on the civilians — the families and employers of the militants — to restrain Hezbollah in the future.

In Gaza, I still can’t tell if Israel is trying to eradicate Hamas or trying to “educate” Hamas, by inflicting a heavy death toll on Hamas militants and heavy pain on the Gaza population. If it is out to destroy Hamas, casualties will be horrific and the aftermath could be Somalia-like chaos. If it is out to educate Hamas, Israel may have achieved its aims.

Of course, this is exactly where George Bush’s America has been for nearly eight full years. Friedman’s latest column might have been titled “Suck. On. This. 2.0”:

These are the leaders of the free world. I sincerely hope things are soon to change.

Read Full Post »

If you’re running a detention centre and you want to make use of coercive treatment, sleep deprivation and torture, the important thing is to make sure you do it often and regularly – that way it becomes “an unpleasant, highly regimented experience.” And that’s OK.

Read Full Post »

Ken Lovell asks:

Seriously, can the moral standing of the USA in the world get any lower?

I certainly hope not.

Read Full Post »

Irony, ahoy!

Administration Calls for Action on Detainees – so, after dragging their heels and keeping people locked up for years without charge or trial, the Bush administration now needs Congress to act urgently. And haven’t we been hearing about how al Qaeda is defeated?

As part of the plan, the administration also wants Congress to “reaffirm,” nearly seven years after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, that the United States “remains engaged in an armed conflict with al Qaeda” and other terrorist groups. The administration used Congress’s original affirmation of an armed conflict, three days after 9/11, not only to invade Afghanistan, but also to incarcerate enemy combatants without trial and to conduct wiretaps on Americans without a court warrant.

This “war” without end provides an interminable justification for our governments to compromise their principles and the rule of law.

Read Full Post »

There is enough research evidence about the effects of sleep deprivation to establish beyond doubt that this sort of monkey business is torture. Any government who wants to lecture the rest of the world about liberty and have the rest of the world keep a straight face needs to condemn and eliminate this sort of abuse.

Read Full Post »

I have written at Public Polity about Janet Albrechtsen’s latest crusade against the dirty hippie brigade. I want to note a couple of other points that didn’t fit with the issues I addressed in that article.

Albrechtsen’s concerns about “activist judges” deciding how society should operate is nothing new. But in attempting to critique the Boumediene v. Bush decision, Janet draws on some arguments about what the decision could imply for the three branches of government that are frightfully flawed. Let’s begin with the notion that:

As The Wall Street Journal’s James Taranto noted, for all the wailing about the evils of Gitmo, “perhaps decades from now we will learn that detainees ended up being abused in some far-off place because the Government closed Guantanamo in response to judicial meddling. Even those who support what the court did today may live to regret it.”

The suggestion is that the Government may respond to a judgment against them by engaging in even shadier practices. Given the Bush administration’s history, it is entirely plausible that this could happen – or more precisely, that it could happen even more than it has in the past. But that doesn’t mean it’s a valid criticism of the judicial decision. It means that the United States has a toxic executive branch that has nothing but contempt for the Constitution.

The second notion Janet draws on is that:

… as Chief Justice John Roberts concluded, the majority’s decision was no win for democracy. Stripping Congress of power, the American people lost “a bit more control over the conduct of this nation’s foreign policy to unelected, politically unaccountable judges”.

Appeals to democracy might have an inherent appeal, but the fact is that the judiciary was given exactly the kind of power it exercised in this case. The Constitution is the foundation legal document of the country, and it is the Supreme Court’s responsibility to protect the integrity of that Constitution. Judicial review of the actions of the other branches of government was always part of the system, and it is a sad indictment of America’s politicised judiciary that the highest judge in the land would fail to say so.

Read Full Post »

Damning evidence:

Former terrorist suspects detained by the United States were tortured, according to medical examinations detailed in a report released Wednesday by a human rights group.

The Massachusetts-based Physicians for Human Rights reached that conclusion after two-day clinical evaluations of 11 former detainees, who had been held at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and in Afghanistan.

The detainees were never charged with crimes.

The report is prefaced by retired U.S. Major Gen. Antonio Taguba, who led the Army’s investigation into the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal in 2003.

“There is no longer any doubt that the current administration committed war crimes,” Taguba says. “The only question is whether those who ordered torture will be held to account.”

The report is available here.

The argument that invading and occupying Iraq is justified because it ended the human rights abuses of a brutal dictator becomes ever shakier as this type of evidence emerges. The only hope for redemption is, as Taguba implies, for the United States to demonstrate its government and justice system are capable of bringing those responsible to justice.

Read Full Post »

Kangaroo Court

Let’s convict some terrorists just in time for the election. Do what needs to be done.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »