As if Stephen Conroy’s grand plan to protect us from the Internets wasn’t bad enough. Now his office has taken to attempting to stifle criticism:
On Tuesday, a policy advisor for Senator Conroy, Belinda Dennett, wrote an email to Internet Industry Association (IIA) board member Carolyn Dalton in an attempt to pressure Newton into reining in [...]
Posts Tagged ‘debate’
Fatally flawed policy and politics
Posted in Australian politics, tagged censorship, debate, Internet filtering, Mark Newton, Stephen Conroy on Saturday, 25 October, 2008 | 4 Comments »
Reverse-framing
Posted in Australian politics, tagged Andrew Bolt, debate, framing on Saturday, 26 July, 2008 | 3 Comments »
I posted a comment in response to the Blair/Bolt Watch Project’s formulation of Bolt’s Law:
Bolt’s Law: the ongoing process by which teh Right’s multiple moral crusades are becoming one giant, intertwined idea despite their complete lack of anything to do with each other.
It was a hastily written reaction to something that I have been bouncing [...]
I’d have said ‘Howard-esque’
Posted in Australian politics, tagged debate, legislation, Lindsay Tanner, Nick Minchin, Senate on Wednesday, 4 June, 2008 | Leave a Comment »
As expected – the claim and counter-claim about whether all legislation should be rammed through without parliamentary oversight or should be held up needlessly gets underway.
ELSEWHERE: Some commentary from Tim Dunlop – it’s interesting that Joe Hockey is happy to acknowledge that “payback” is part of the motivation for trying to stall legislation.
Agreement with GrodsCorp
Posted in Australian politics, tagged debate, Government, Labor, legislation, Libs, Parliament, same-sex relationships, superannuation on Tuesday, 3 June, 2008 | 1 Comment »
I has it.
UPDATE: On the flipside is this tactic from the Opposition, which manages to both (i) stall the Government’s plan to eliminate a clear form of discrimination and (ii) implicitly suggest that homosexual partnerships are on a par with siblings and other carers rather than married or de facto heterosexual couples. There should not [...]
Big Gun vs Red Julia
Posted in Australian politics, tagged debate, industrial relations, Joe Hockey, Julia Gillard on Wednesday, 7 November, 2007 | Leave a Comment »
The IR czars are holding their National Press Club debate today – 12:30pm EDST on ABC (no indication in my TV guide of Nine/worm coverage). I’ll be in a cave, during that time, so I’ll have to catch up on it later.
The best of debates; the worst of debates
Posted in Australian politics, tagged debate, Joe Hockey, Julia Gillard, TV on Monday, 5 November, 2007 | Leave a Comment »
The good news: Joe Hockey and Julia Gillard are having a debate.
The bad news: It’s on Sunrise this morning. Based on last week’s Turnbull vs Garrett match-up, it won’t exactly break new ground or provide real debate, but it’s (hopefully) better than nothing.
UPDATE: Joe promised to resign as a Minister if there are any substantial [...]
Running from a hiding
Posted in Australian politics, tagged debate, John Howard, Kevin Rudd on Saturday, 3 November, 2007 | Leave a Comment »
Howard won’t put himself through another debate:
“We had a good debate two weeks ago,” he told reporters in Darwin.
Well, one of you did.
Someone needs to do this to JWH on his morning walk tomorrow:
Treasurers’ debate liveblog
Posted in Australian politics, tagged debate, Peter Costello, Wayne Swan on Tuesday, 30 October, 2007 | Leave a Comment »
Swan wins the toss and will kick off. Costello to run with the wind.
Swan opening: Australia needs a plan. Ours is about investing in our people. We’ll follow strict rules for fiscal restraint. You can’t fix jack without a strong economy. Prosperity has come from reforms and helped by the mining boom. We have a [...]
Debate reminder
Posted in Australian politics, tagged debate, Peter Costello, Wayne Swan on Tuesday, 30 October, 2007 | Leave a Comment »
Smirk vs Trade Union Member.
12:30pm (EDST) on ABC.

