Andrew Bolt faced a dilemma today, when two of the core themes of his work came into conflict. In this case, the “multiculturalism is destroying the fabric of society” theme was entirely irreconcilable with the “negligence lawsuits are destroying the fabric of society” theme.
Which did he choose to discard so that he could drive home his other point? Make your prediction and follow the link to find out!
“why note government programs to make them irrelevant? ”
Is that a grammatical error? Im not even sure what that is meant to mean?
I assume “note” was supposed to be “not”. But from a professional writer who has posted a critique of apostrophe usage in the past week (despite his own issues with “its” vs “it’s”), reading what one wrote before pressing the “Publish” button would be advised.
Especially when it’s only a line or two of text.